If it is determined that the results from an Interpol transaction do not correlate to the subject in the original inquiry, what should be done?

When the results from an Interpol transaction do not correlate to the subject in the original inquiry, the appropriate action is to document the discrepancy in agency records. This practice is vital for several reasons.

Firstly, thorough documentation ensures that there is a clear and accurate record of the discrepancy for future reference. This can be important for maintaining the integrity of investigation processes and for accountability within the agency. Having documented evidence of the results and any inconsistencies allows officers and investigators to review and evaluate the reliability of the data provided by Interpol.

Secondly, documenting such discrepancies provides a foundation for additional investigative steps that may be necessary. If the initial inquiry was based on certain assumptions or information, having a clear record of what was received versus what was expected can guide further actions, be it refining search criteria, conducting additional research, or reaching out to other agencies for clarification.

Additionally, maintaining accurate documentation aligns with best practices in law enforcement and data management, fostering transparency and helping to build a comprehensive case file that could be crucial for any ongoing or future investigations.

While other options may seem tempting, they do not align with the best practices for handling discrepancies in such critical information. Ignoring the results can lead to missed opportunities or unresolved issues. Resubmitting the inquiry for clarification